Things continue to be very messed up in my personal life and technically this blog is still on hiatus though i remain hopeful that i can get it back up and running with regular updates featuring indepth commentaries on Muppet/Henson (and other) fandom in the next month or two so keep checking back from time to time.
In the meantime, i contributed a special guest post to a new Muppet blog which i reccomend checking out - the Muppet Mindset (http://themuppetmindset.blogspot.com). This was created to give Muppet fans that were having a hard time getting articles and reviews published on Muppet Central in a timely fashion a chance to have their works read.
Being the resident "Daytime Emmys expert", i contributed a review/analysis of this year's ceremony (where Sesame Street won a Lifetime Achievement award). While less extensive than it would have been if i was writing it specifically for this site, it was still a very indepth look at how changes in the daytime landscape was affecting the Daytime Emmys televised broadcast - and in turn how that affects the Muppets/Henson's representation on it.
The complete article was more indepth than what that particular webmaster wanted and he chose to keep it limited to a wrap-up of Sesame Street's appearance on the show (even at the expense of Henson's other contender, Sid the Science Kid). Which is okay - considering the direction he wanted to see it take i agree with the changes he made. However, i felt that fans who wanted a more complete picture of what's going on with the Emmys should have access to the full article so i'm putting it here. Consider this kind of like the "bonus material" you would find on a dvd!
I encourage everyone to check out the Mindset. It has a lot in common with this blog though obviously some important differences - as you can see from the variations in the following article, it's a bit like the differences one would expect from a book review that appears in Entertainment Weekly and one that is published in The Nation. Both have merits and each one is geared towards its vision and readership.
Incidentally in the below article, i mention how those interested in learning even further more detailed information on the convoluted mess that is the rules governing the nomination/judging on the Daytime Emmys can seek out information elsewhere on the web. After i wrote that, i found a wonderful article that looks at the situation that summerizes the whole fiasco extremely well. Jeremy in Chicago writes a weekly review and analysis of One Life to Live for Soaptown USA. I have his site bookmarked and look forward to reading it each week as i enjoy how deeply he delves and i generally tend to agree with his views about 90% of the time (and the rest of the time he at least defends his positions well). In a way it's kind of like what this blog might be like if i made it a One Life to Live blog instead of a Muppet one! At any rate, his current article hits the nail right on the mark as he looks at all the Daytime Emmys' problems and how they could best be fixed so if you want to learn even more about this controversial element of the Daytime Emmys, by all means check it out
here!
------------------------------------------
I love the Daytime Emmys! Since i've never been into sports, i always joke that the Daytime Emmys are my personal version of the Super Bowl - the time of year i anticipate months beforehand, analysing the strengths and weaknesses of the competitors, keeping up with critics' picks and then parking myself in front of the television set during the broadcast with my freshly ordered pizza and cheering on my favorite "teams", screaming at the screen all the while!
The reason i get so into them is because the event combines two of my biggest areas of fandom - Muppets/Henson Company and One Life to Live - as they're both (hopefully!) honored for their recent achievements. While most Muppet fans tune in to see Sesame Street (and any other non-primetime television venture Henson is involved with - currently Sid the Science Kid) represented, my excitement is doubled as i'm also cheering on my fictional friends from Llanview.
On my regular blog, Muppet Freak (temporarily on hiatus due to personal challenges in my offline life), i write indepth comentaries about fandom. Although about 15% of it is non-Henson content, i rarely write about soaps (the main exception being when it comes to the Daytime Emmys) since - let's face it - a non-soap watcher listening to a soap fan prattle on is much like Ernie sitting through Bert's missives about his paper clip collection. With this in mind, while this review is being written with the Muppet fan in mind, i'll still be touching on issues that deal with daytime dramas only because changes taking place in the industry have a direct effect on the state of the Daytime Emmys - and subsequently how the Muppets/Henson are represented at the annual awards. Hopefully readers will find this interesting, but in the event they don't, i'll spread some random Muppet/Henson Trivia Facts throughout to keep everyone engaged!
You see, this year's ceremony almost wasn't aired on television. The major networks all passed on it. It was a last-minute rescue from a group of producers with connections with the CW Network that enabled the show to go on our screens (though delayed two months from its usual June date).
Usually the networks jump through flaming hoops like Gonzo on waterskiis to televise awards shows so why didn't anyone want to touch the Daytime Emmys? The first reason is ratings. Much like the daytime programming they honor, ratings for the Daytime Emmys have steadily declined over the years. As the overall media landscape changes, daytime television - largely made up of news, talk shows, daytime dramas, game shows and children's programming - has struggled to hold onto viewers and remain relevant. That fight for relevancy in turn transfers to the primetime broadcast of this segment of television programming. In these tough economic times, daytime programming chiefs have figured out what their primetime and cable cousins have - that it's cheaper to produce unscripted reality shows. This development is bad news for soap operas which production-wise incorporates all the areas reality programming seeks to elminate - large casts of actors, writers, elaborate sets, studio space, etc. Although daytime dramas are just one genre that makes up daytime programming, they've traditionally been the main focus of and audience draw to the Daytime Emmys. As the number of soaps left on the air have started to decline (and are expected to be completely gone within the next five to ten years), the Daytime Emmy broadcast must adapt to this changing landscape or risk facing the same extinction as the drama series that have long predominated it.
However, there's also another reason why the Daytime Emmys have struggled with relevancy and why the networks have started to shy away from them. The validity of the awards themselves have been in question for the last several years. Controversy has surrounded the judging process in terms of the final decisions, the nominations, and even the PRE-nominations! The myriad of issues surrounding this mess could fill a book and is way too complex and histrionic to delve into here, but the end result has been year after year of nominations and awards that have left the fans and critics that closely follow the soaps (though these issues affect all the daytime genres) scratching their heads in bewilderment. Of course if the target audience collectively feels that the awards are not going to the people who most deserve them, they'll stop watching and throw another big monkey wrench in the ceremony's ratings. The National Academy of Television Arts and Sciences (who administer the Emmys) have responded to the hooplah by attempting to tweak the process, adding new or adjusted rules each year, but it seems the more they try to fix the problems, the more they actually make them worse. Again, other than one change that was made this year that i'll discuss later, i won't go into detail on the history of these rules, but anyone truly interested in reading more information of the Daytime Emmys and its judging controversies can track down numerous places online that discuss these issues. [Am i losing you yet? Is this not Muppety enough for you? Then here's your first Muppet Trivia Fact: Muppeteer (and current Sesame Street head writer) Joey Mazzarino is married to Broadway actress Kerry Butler who played Nash Brennan's ex-girlfriend, Claudia Reston on One Life to Live in 2006 where she displayed both her acting and singing skills. Sesame fans will remember her as Ms. Camp the letter carrier in episode 4008.]
So it's amidst this background that the CW Network - who hasn't been that involved previously with daytime programming itself
- took on the challenges of airing the 36th Annual Daytime Emmys. The first of its kind to not be carried by a major network faced the unenviable task of proving to the viewers and the industry that the awards event was worth primetime broadcast. Sesame fans were particularly interested since being the year of their 40th anniversary, a tribute of some sort was anticipated. Would the CW Network de-emphasize the children's genre or would they instead give them a greater focus knowing that they would need to show more diversity in showcasing the various elements of daytime programming? Thankfully, signs pointed more toward the latter when CW announced that not only would Sesame Street be honored for their 40 years, but also that recognition would come in the form of a Lifetime Achievement Award.
Before the awards themselves, the traditional Pre-Awards Show aired where red-carpet interviews were conducted amidst the typical media spectacle of the arriving nominees and presenters' fashion parade. This was largely done on a split-screen format with interviews occuring on the right-hand side and shots of arriving celebrities viewed on the left. After about 15 minutes, the Muppet performers were shown walking down the red carpet in their evening finery with their Muppet characters on their hands waving and shaking hands with the crowd. Shortly after, Big Bird and Elmo were interviewed together (Big Bird was wearing a "Joan Ganz Cooney" while Elmo was sporting a "Barney - not the dinosaur")
On a non-Muppet note, i appreciated how various members of the soap press were asked to provide their picks for the major awards. These are people familiar with the nominees' complete body of work as opposed to the short reels the judges base their decisions on. I actually wanted to kiss Nelson Branco when he dared to state when asked who should win the Outstanding Drama Series award that all the soaps that really should deserve to win weren't nominated. [What's that you say? You could care less? Fine - here's Muppet Trivia #2: In addition to Muppeteering, Fran Brill has side careers as a voice artist and an actress. In the soap industry, she's best known for her critically acclaimed role as Fran Bachman in How to Survive a Marriage for which she won an Afternoon TV Writers & Editors award. She's also appeared on Edge of Night, Guiding Light, and All My Children.]
The award show itself began with a comedy bit involving Oscar checking tickets and keeping Gordon and Elmo from entering, a positive sign that no matter what else might follow during the next two hours, the evening would be very Muppety! This was followed by an opening number with host Vanessa Williams intercut with video footage of her superimposed Forrest Gump-style interacting with various daytime show personalities including appearing in Big Bird's nest. Between the comedic open and the musical number, the show was off to a strong start and seemed as if it was determined to show that much like its primetime counterpart, this would be an entertaining program with something for everyone.
Unfortunately, after the first drama award was handed out, things went quickly downhill. All of a sudden, it seemed as if someone just realized that between all the stuff they had planned, there wouldn't be enough time to get it all done in two hours so everything became extremely rushed. The rest of the drama awards cut out the standard clips of nominees' work as their names were read and winners were cued to wrap up their acceptance speeches before they could even catch their breath from running up to the stage. Nonetheless the producers plowed ahead with totally unneeded and unnecessairy segments such as a fashion display and more musical numbers from Williams to the detriment of announcing winners of the untelevised Creative Arts Awards. Time management wasn't the only area that appeared to suffer from the lack of planning - the voiceovers announcing winners' accomplishments and previous Emmy history made several factual errors throughout the evening. Issues with time plagued the telecast for the rest of the night all the way up to the very end which concluded with a very rushed "The Outstanding Drama Series Emmy goes to the Bold & the Beautiful - congratulations - CREDITS!!"
Thankfully the Sesame Street content wasn't too affected. Besides the Oscar/Gordon/Elmo running gag, the next appearance was the handing out of the Outstanding Performer in a Children's Series award with FOUR of the five nominations coming from Sesame Street (Leslie Carrera-Rudolph as Abby Cadabby, Chris Knowings as Chris Robinson, Martin P. Robinson as Telly Monster and winner Kevin Clash as Elmo). Unlike the drama awards, this category's nominees were granted the courtesy of having clips showing the work they were nominated for shown. Even though it may not have been equally spread among the genres and shows, Sesame Street at least was given much respect throughout the evening.
Now here i have to rant a bit about a judging rules change made this year that i strongly disagree with. Traditionally when someone is nominated for their work, they then submit a reel for the judges consisting of two episodes representing their best work from that year. Now this may work better for a show like Sesame Street that currently only produces 26 shows a season. However this is more problematic for the serials that typically produce five one-hour shows almost every week of the year with almost no reruns. Also consider that the typical soap episode rotates between three to six storylines so an actor is typically seen about a total of ten minutes during a 36 minute episode. This year, instead of submitting two episodes, nominees only got to include one on the reel. As if they weren't already being judged on too small a sample representing a year's worth of work, this practice of being represented by a single episode eliminates the nominees' ability to demonstrate range or diversity and further encourages producers and writers to create "stunt episodes" made solely for submitting to the Emmy committees.
As a One Life to Live fan, i can cite a specific example of how this change affects the judging. Like my fandom for the Muppets, my OLTL love is not made of blind cheerleading. I'll be the first to praise my favorite shows when they do things well and first to point out when they're slacking. I can objectively say that 2008 was a banner year for OLTL's writing team. Under head writer Ron Carlivati's pen, he cares deeply about the show's history and uses it to propel present stories. The present writing regime is among the show's all time best (and it's suffered from some very bad ones since the late 90's!) and was viewed among fans and critics as the strongest among its peers. They were also best prepared and least affected by the notorious 2008 Writers' Strike. Outstanding Writing 2008 was One Life's award to win. However even though they had an embarrassment of riches to choose from, someone made the boneheaded decision to submit the "So You Want to Be Shane Morasco's Father" episode for that category's reel. While this same episode previously won a Director's Guild Award, it was a completely inappropriate choice for showcasing the best of the show's writing and when i heard that's what they submitted, i knew they'd lose. Why they went with that episode over any of their superb June run of episodes featuring Dorian Lord's takeover of Buchanan Enterprises and Nash's accidental death is beyond me. It all comes down to the ever-important reel and choosing the right episode has everything to do with who wins regardless of how well or poorly the show in question did the rest of the year. [Okay, this looks like a good time for more Muppet/Henson trivia! Farscape's Murray Bartlett who played John Crichton's best friend back on Earth, D.K., can presently be seen on Guiding Light.]
Now in the spirit of full disclosure, i'll admit that i don't know if that rule change applies to all the other genres besides the drama awards, but it's unlikely that all the categories weren't affected. So let's look at how being judged on a single episode affects Sesame Street. Even though 80% of this year's nominations for Outstanding Performer came from Sesame, the present system lends itself towards favoring a Kevin Clash win (as was indeed the case). In addition to the regular show that makes up the first 2/3's of a current Sesame Street episode, the concluding segment of Elmo's World gives Clash an extra 20 minute advantage to showcase his work. Without the benefit of a second episode, the other performers - human cast and Muppeteers - are effectively being judged on one "street scene" and if they're lucky maybe one other short bit. Nothing against Clash's work which remains top-notch but the guy already has enough Emmys. As long as the new rule remains active, it's unlikely any of his castmates have a fair chance running against him.
Finally came the Lifetime Achievement Tribute/Award. Sandra Oh gave the introductory speech holding her "cookie fairy" wand from the episode she appeared in. Though this was certainly an unintended element, her giving the spech in front of a big red curtain made it look as if she was in the Muppet Theatre! A montage of clips followed (an updated version of the timeline from The Street We Live On). Humans and Muppets from Sesame (and even Elmo's goldfish Dorothy) appeared on stage singing a medley of Sesame Street favorites with new lyrics honoring and poking fun at the daytime landscape. Once Executive Producer Carol-Lynn Parente came up on stage to give the acceptance speech, the Muppeteers came out of "hiding" holding up their characters allowing human cast members, Muppets, and the performers who bring them to life to bask in the glory of their honor. Of course in typical Muppet fashion, Cookie Monster ate the award before everyone left the stage ("taste even better than Latin Grammy!") Besides being a hilarious final touch, it was also a very brave performance by David Rudman (who looked incredibly dashing!) allowing himself to be fully seen performing Cookie when most people out there think Frank Oz still does the character. Rudman's performance was spot-on perfect though so now half of America probably thinks Frank had an incredible Hollywood makeover!
The tribute was not at all affected by the show's time problems which may have left some viewers who didn't understand or appreciate the importance of the Lifetime Achievement Award going to a groundbreaking children's show that has lasted for four decades and won hundreds of Emmys thinking they were given too much time. But anyone who truly felt this way has an open invite to Oscar's Grouch Celebration After-Party.
There was one other part of the ceremony that was unexpected and given ample time to take place without being rushed that really impressed me. Betty White came out to honor Guiding Light which is about to leave the airwaves (not by the show's choice but rather network cancellation). Given that this was neither an anniversary year nor were they up for Best Show, they really didn't have to do this, but given how the first soap to be televised is the latest casualty of the genre's endangerment, i found it very classy to allow them the chance to come on stage and take a final bow in front of their fans and peers. Very good move on the part of NATAS.
As a whole, the ceremony was very uneven and suffered from underplanning and trying too hard to show it's still relevant that they undermined the show's ability to truly demonstrate this. While the show continued to garner lower ratings than the year prior, it was a personal ratings success for CW and ABC has already expressed interest in picking up the broadcast of next year's ceremony. (CW has first refusal rights though). Many viewers were probably left disappointed but Sesame fans at least had every reason to be fully satisfied. Including the Pre-Show, Sesame related screen time totalled about 18 minutes. Even when they weren't on, their peers in all the other genres often would give them shout outs and mini salutes and i was personally thrilled to see OLTL's Susan Haskell (one of my favorites from the show - the lady is an absolute powerhouse!) cheering on Sesame throughout the evening and concluding her well-deserved Lead Actress acceptance speech proclaiming how she would do her best to get all the Sesame gang's autographs.
Since the Creative Arts Awards were glossed over due to the time problems, here's the final rundown on how well Sesame/Henson did this year:
Sid the Science Kid did not win either of its two nominations for Outstanding Children's Animated Program or Outstanding Achievement in Main Title and Graphic Design.
Sesame Street was nominated for (but did not win):
- Outstanding Pre-School Children's Show
- Outstanding Original Song - Children's and Animation (three nominations for "The Addition Expedition", "Elmo's Ducks", and "I Don't Wanna Be a Prince")
- Outstanding Achievement in Lighting Direction
- Outstanding Achievement in Music Direction and Composition
- Outstanding Achievement in Technical Direction/Electronic Camera/Video
- Outstanding Writing in a Children's Series
In addition to the aforementioned Lifetime Achievement Award and Kevin Clash's Outstanding Performer in a Children's Series win (along with Carrera-Rudolph's, Knowings' and Robinson's nominations), Sesame Street also won awards for:
- Outstanding Direction in a Children's Series
- Outstanding Achievement in Costume Design/Styling
- New Approaches - Daytime Children's Entertainment
---------------------------------------
Before i close, i'll include here some OLTL comments i would have made if the above article was originally intended to be published on this blog. While no one soap dominated the wins (either televised or total), One Life to Live ended up being the most awarded soap for the second year in a row (they actually tied with All My Children this year with five wins each.) Of the "big" televised awards, they did indeed lose the writing award (Again, WHY, OLTL - *WHY* did you think the "So You Want..." episode was the one to show off the writing when you had such primetime worthy endeavors like "Drunk With Power", "Long Live the Queen", and "My Heart" - and that's just from June alone!) They did win the directing award and Susan Haskell won her second Emmy after about 15 years as Marty Saybrooke in what was one of the evening's most competitive races. Even though Bree Williamson had the reel and was many a critic's pick, she didn't win the Best Supporting Actress award, but she has a very strong chance at it next year (though she'll outdoubtedly be facing stiff competition from her own show alone!)
Finally, open memo to Robin Strasser: i know you often decline having your name considered for Emmy nomination given your already having won one, and for your past involvement with NATAS. I sincerely hope you'll allow yourself the opportunity to be considered next year, especially given the shabby treatment ABC is showing towards its veteran actors. After your 63% paycut in 2003, i find it appalling the way you were treated by the network during your latest contract negotiations especially considering the devastating impact the show would suffer if Dorian Lord was off the campus at this time. Though your work is always top-notch, 2008 was a particularly fine year for you and had you chosen to run and submitted the "Drunk With Power" episode for your reel, you would have undoubtedly walked away with the award as that whole episode was basically a total lesson to all your peers as to "how it's done". Please allow yourself the opportunity to claim the rewards that are rightfully yours.
Don't know when i'll be back again here but check back after a month or so. There's some big Muppet/Henson stuff on the horizon and i hope to return with more indepth commentaries, critiques, analysis, and tributes.